A new theory of electricity is needed, first of all, because the modern theory of electricity is built on a conduction current that does not exist in nature. And this paradox is obvious even to schoolchildren who observe currents with negative and positive charges on oscilloscopes. The modern theory of electricity is not able to clearly explain many of the mysteries of electricity. This article explains some of the mysteries that the modern theory of electricity could not explain.

Two hundred years ago, Faraday received a current with negative and positive charges, which is distributed in the layer of ether adjacent to the conductor. The one who does not know this is not worth going into the theory of electricity. The discovery is based on the realization that in the theory of electricity there is no extraneous force, instead of which an electromotive force acts, formed by the difference in electrical potentials, between the zero potential of the conductor and the negative (or positive) potential of the current source. This difference in electrical potentials creates in the circuit the force of motion of the charges. The difference of electric potentials creates a force, which may well be called Coulomb force. And then it is not clear why it was necessary to invent an outside force.

According to our hypothesis, the conversion of electrons and positrons into each other occurs by replacing the charge motion vector with the opposite vector. This is explained by the fact that all elements of the electron's magnetoelectric system are opposite to all elements of the positron's magnetoelectric system. And this opposite is determined by the vector of their movement in space. Therefore, it is only necessary to change the motion vector of one of the charges to the opposite vector, so immediately this charge turns into its antipode.

I wrote this article when I was 33, and I, who did not understand anything in physics, but who had logical thinking, were outraged by those alogisms and paradoxes that flowed from Einstein’s logic of relativity theory. But it was criticism at the level of emotions. Now, when I began to think a little bit in physics, and when I discovered the law of the difference of gravitational potentials, and based on it I built a five-dimensional frame of reference, it is now possible to prove the inaccuracy of Einstein’s theory of relativity at the level of physical laws.

The body of an atom is composed of gravitons. Moreover, all gravitons are polarized north-south to the center of the atom. And the electron, jumping from graviton to graviton, retains its north-south polarization, where the electron has the top - the north, and the bottom - the south. Electrons have such spatial configuration both in the body of the atom and in the electromagnetic wave. Electrons in the electron-positron current, which propagates in the ether adjacent to the conductor, have the same spatial configuration, as evidenced by Faraday’s experiment, set two hundred years ago, which modern physicists knew but forgot. Strictly speaking, it is not the electrons that rotate around the nucleus of the atom, but their energy in the form of photons, which jump from one graviton to a neighboring graviton.

Uma foto de um átomo de hidrogênio tirada com um microscópio de foto-ionização mostra que os elétrons giram em torno do núcleo de um átomo que não está em orbitais, mas em órbitas determinadas pelas leis da eletrodinâmica clássica. Vendo órbitas de pleno direito na foto e teimosamente continuam a chamá-las de orbitais é, em nossa opinião, como a esquizofrenia. As ligações de valência entre os átomos são determinadas pelo seu magnetismo. A. A hipótese de Ampere sobre a natureza do magnetismo, baseada no fato de que os átomos de todas as substâncias, girando em torno do núcleo de um átomo, geram microcorrentes, dando origem ao magnetismo do átomo, não é verdade. O magnetismo de um átomo é determinado pelo desequilíbrio de carga, porque os potenciais negativo e positivo atuam perpendicularmente entre si.

A ray of light, refracted by a glass prism, splits into multicolored rays. And it is this set of rays that forms what we call sunlight. Thus, light is a set of multi-colored photons. And the photon itself is a quantum of one or another color.

The unifying element of all interactions: gravitational, magnetic, electromagnetic, nuclear-strong, nuclear-weak is graviton. Gravitons are generated by atoms of atoms rotating at great speed. Graviton is a mini whirl of ether, which by its rotation generates the north and south poles of magnets. All matter of the universe is composed of gravitons and is surrounded by them. Attracted to each other by different poles, gravitons form graviton chains that form gravitational, magnetic and electromagnetic fields. Gravitons are also quanta of the gravitational fields of atoms and their nuclei.

A. Ampere's hypothesis about the nature of magnetism, based on the fact that the atoms of all substances, spinning around the nucleus of the atom, generate microcurrents that produce magnetism is not true. Magnetism is determined by gravitons - magnetic dipoles, from which the entire material world is composed.

Summary A new concept of electricity is needed primarily because the modern concept of electricity believes that the conduction current is the movement of free electrons with stationary ions. But Faraday two hundred years ago put an experiment that showed that the conduction current is a movement, both negative and positive charges In addition, the current concept of electricity is not able to explain, for example, how an electric current generates magnetism, how superconductivity is formed, how the current is rectified, etc. The new concept of electricity must begin with the realization that the ether is not only the medium of light propagation, but the environment in which natural and artificial electric currents are distributed. Key words: superconductivity, photoelectric effect, current, electron, positron, graviton.